Is It Baseball Or Is It Zen?
Andrew Schelling calls for baseball’s
return to the Zen economy of simple, rough pleasures, to the
wabi-sabi spirit of its early years.
In Zen there’s a saying that the
bodhisattva’s “play” is saving the world. The
questions this brings forth are good: Is Buddhism serious? Is it
playful? Is it a game, like baseball? There’s something both
distinctive and alluring that Buddhist ceremony and baseball
share—adults play with all the engrossed seriousness of
children at something most of the grownup world considers
meaningless.
Buddhist practice will not become an integral
part of American life until it has transformed and been transformed
by a number of specifically American pastimes. Only when it has
seamlessly encountered American culture and taken on a popular
inflection will it no longer seem an exotic transplant. Casting an
eye back to Japan—which had a parallel encounter with Buddhist
forms in the 12th century—it’s clear that the deep
influence of Zen came through its interaction with the martial arts,
flower arrangement, archery, architecture, poetry and chado,
or tea ceremony. Not to mention pottery, basketry and cooking. I want
to single out tea for a moment though.
Tea as a formal ceremony arrived from China
probably with Buddhist monks, but it initially took hold in Japan as
a cultivated activity for the samurai and their warlords. As times
changed and the power of a merchant class grew, tea transformed into
a prestige event convened by wealthy merchants to display the costly,
highly decorative, exotic tea equipment they had acquired. Leonard
Koren says in his book Wabi-Sabi for Artists, Designers, Poets &
Philosophers, “The sixteenth century tea room was much like
the golf course of today for Japanese businessmen. It was where
wealthy merchants cultivated new business contracts. It was also
where warriors sought and consummated political alliances and
celebrated battle victories. (All warriors during this period learned
the art of tea.)”
Tea only came into its own under the influence of Sen Rikyu
(1522-1591), who broke with the tradition of the wealthy, and even
scandalized things a bit. He brought to tea the keystone values that
pervade it today and make it the prime example of Zen culture:
simplicity, spiritual refinement and the wabi-sabi aesthetic in which
objects are valued for being unpretentious, ungainly, imperfect,
irregular and made of rustic materials drawn from the peasant
village.
Baseball in this country has followed a
curiously similar track, perhaps with a more unwashed cast of
characters. It started with the brash, Walt Whitman-like sons of
Abner Doubleday, the legendary inventor of the game—a
hard-fought contest for urban immigrants and unrestrained roughs. By
engaging in an exactingly formal ceremony, ferociously war-like
“clans” could test themselves against one another. Irish
and Italians and Poles fought it out on the diamond. Doing so they
became Americans. In Whitman’s words: “It’s our
game—the American game. It will take our people out of doors,
fill them with oxygen, give them a larger physical stoicism.”
Baseball has through its circuitous windings come to be a game played
today by flashy, successful, multi-millionaire capitalists, and Major
League baseball appears at moments more about costly paraphernalia
and lucrative contracts than the game itself. Its audience along the
way has gotten skittish, and every threat of a new strike by the
wealthy ballplayers against the wealthier corporate owners comes
accompanied with a warning that the sport itself, at its professional
level, may collapse. It seems possible that baseball fans may simply
turn away in search of more modest pastimes. Perhaps the moment is
ripe for a new Sen Rikyu, and a turn to the Zen economy of simple,
rough pleasures.
Yet the Zen-like approach of simplicity, along with an austere or
folksy formalism, has never deserted baseball. In the 1920’s
there was the cornfield hero of Joe Jackson’s day, and
big-jawed kids like Bob Feller stepped out of little towns. The
blue-collar ballplayer who brings his lunchbox to the park may also
be a figure of the past, but he still stands at the yearning heart of
the seasoned fan and the radio announcer.
Much like the Negro or “shadow” League, a down-home world
of folklore and koan-reminiscent sayings stands in as a kind of
shadow—baseball’s wisdom tradition. Leo Durocher, Branch
Rickey and many others—especially the well-known Yogi
Berra—have provided a colorful folk wisdom based on paradox,
humor and tiny sayings that punch through the anguish of everyday
life. “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.” Is
this baseball or is it Zen?
Baseball also has mysterious “cases”
(as they are termed in Zen literature). Did Babe Ruth really point to
the seat where his home run would land before swatting it? In the
first game of the 1989 World Series, did a hobbled Kirk Gibson,
pulling on his uniform in the ninth inning, really tell his coach, I
have one good swing in me? Did Nansen really cut that cat in half?
Was “Cool Papa” Bell so fast (as his roommate, the
peerless Satchell Paige, tells it) that he could switch off the light
and be in bed before the room got dark? Is it the wind or the flag
that ripples over Yankee Stadium? Is it your mind?
Here’s an important case from the annals of baseball that all
practitioners should deeply investigate. They say it happened in 1947
when Branch Rickey, general manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers, brought
Jackie Robinson into Major League baseball, breaking the color line.
At the Dodgers’ first game in St. Louis, a crowd of curious,
bleakly hostile, even violent spectators, rose up when the Dodgers
took the field, jeering and cursing the first black player as he
stood by first base. Pee Wee Reese, the Dodgers’ all-star
shortstop, walked over to Robinson and dropped his arm over his
teammate’s shoulder. Just a simple gesture, way ahead of the
curve of most of North America. It sobered and quieted the surging
crowd.
Hold on to that quiet moment and consider this
traditional story. One of the renowned koans of Zen—a case Zen
students regularly investigate—comes from the Platform Sutra
of the Sixth Patriarch, whose name is Hui Neng. Hui Neng, an
unlettered janitor, has just secretly received the robe, bowl and
scepter of transmission from his teacher, the Fifth Patriarch,
Hung-jen. Fleeing the jealous monks of East Mountain monastery, Hui
Neng is pursued by one particularly volatile figure, Hui-ming, who
believes Hui Neng carries something of inestimable value. As Hui Neng
reaches the summit of Mount Ta-yu, Hui-ming, overtaking him, raises
an arm to strike a murderous blow. Hui Neng cries, “Quick! Not
thinking good or evil, what was your original face before your
parents were born?” Hui-ming stops dead in his tracks with a
satori experience.
Perhaps after “What is the sound of one hand clapping?”
this question, “What is your original face?” is the most
renowned bit of Zen folklore.
Now return to St. Louis, May 1947. There stands Pee Wee Reese, having
spontaneously stepped over to his teammate Jackie Robinson, a man
whose heroism was still untested. Pee Wee slings his arm around the
man he shares infield duty with. What does the gesture say to that
jeering, deluded crowd? “Quick! Not thinking good or
evil”—black or white—“what was your original
face before your parents were born?”
Where does an American go now to find the Zen
economy in baseball I spoke of earlier? Is it still with us? I
suspect much of its spirit has drifted south of the border—another
“shadow” league—to Mexico, El Salvador, Cuba and
the Dominican Republic. Yet it stays here with us too, on the
sandlots where children play. Children approach baseball as a
practitioner approaches meditation—I mean, it is not
preparation for anything, it is not practice. They pursue the endless
perfectibility of form. Just as in Zen you sit to be a sitting
buddha, children when they play baseball aren’t on their way
somewhere. They play ball to be ballplayers.
Remember March and early April 2001, when the Taliban rulers of
Afghan-istan first threatened to destroy all Buddhist images in their
country, including the enormous cliff-carved buddhas at Bamiyan—and
then, in the face of protest from the world, did destroy them? I kept
trying to explain to my daughter and her friends what it would mean
to have treasures or edifices comparable to those destroyed in North
America (this was before September 11). The closest thing I could
think of was what if some administration tore down Yankee Stadium
(the house that Ruth built), Fenway Park or Wrigley Field? In a
country as raw, youthful and full of immigrant peoples as the United
States, what else has so focused the aspirations of an entire
population? I think we’ve moved past the period when Ellis
Island held our gaze. Immigrants no longer come through Ellis Island,
and I do not believe the Statue of Liberty reflects what the New York
City tourist board wants you to think. More and more I wonder if
baseball parks don’t provide the most solid emblem of human
aspiration.
When the Boston Red Sox picked up Pedro
Martinez in the late 1990’s, that brought the enormous
Dominican Republic populations in the United States—Americans,
but still Dominican—to the ballparks. It’s a little bit
like when, in the 1970’s, Roberto Clemente galvanized the
Latin/African-American population and suddenly there existed a team
that seemed everything this nation had promised. Baseball, regularly
played by immigrants, brings to a focus the hopes, the dreams, the
pain, the aspirations and the disappointments of an entire culture.
How far is it now to those old buddhas in Bamiyan? What must they
have done for the caravan riders who traveled down across the
Gangetic plains, or back along the Silk Road and into China. Already
Fenway Park is a destination for pilgrims.
Baseball—ceremonial and formal in its own
way as a tea ceremony, yet year after year unpredictable. With
baseball season heading into October as I write this, weighty
questions begin to crop up. Is this the year for the Boston Red Sox?
Will the curse of the Bambino never end? Can Pete Rose be given a
reprieve and return to baseball? Might a Chicago Cubs player ever
savor a World Series ring? Underneath lie more pressing questions.
Can baseball rediscover its folkloric precepts and take the fork in
its own road? Will it relocate its native simplicity and turn out
sages again—living buddhas—the likes of Satchel Paige,
Pee Wee Reese or Buck O’Neil?
To the Buddhist I’d turn and inquire, is
there any American piece of turf that shares a closer kinship with
the meditation hall than the baseball park? Is there a mind in which
the two diamonds—that of Buddhist enlightenment and that of the
ballfield—are identical? One or two hundred years down the road
shall we look for an answer?
Poet, translator and avid mountaineer,
Andrew Schelling teaches at Naropa University. He is a longtime
student of Zen. His translations of poetry from classical India are
widely anthologized. Growing up in New England, Schelling was a
frequent visitor to Fenway Park, home of the tragic Boston Red Sox.
Recent titles include Tea Shack Interior: New & Selected
Poetry and Wild Form, Savage Grammar: Poetry, Ecology, Asia.
No comments:
Post a Comment