I have fortunate to check this place out. It would be a simple thing to remove the dam- all that has to happen is it to happen. Take out the damn dams!
http://www.beyondsearsvilledam.org/Beyond_Searsville_Dam/Home.html
Why the Beyond Searsville Dam coalition?
For over a century,
Stanford University’s antiquated Searsville Dam has had an enormous
negative impact on San Francisquito Creek watershed and greater San
Francisco Bay estuary. Built between 1890 and 1892, the 65-foot tall and
275-foot wide Searsville Dam has lost over 90% of its original water
storage capacity as roughly 1.5 million cubic yards of sediment has
filled in the reservoir. Searsville Dam does not provide potable water,
flood control, or hydropower.
The disappearing reservoir
behind the dam flooded and buried a unique valley where over six streams
flowed for miles and merged together among adjacent wetland ponds and
vast riparian forests before squeezing through a small gorge where the
dam now stands. With potential dam removal, restoration of this valley
and ponds can provide a valuable flood protection function by soaking up
and retaining winter flows and releasing them gradually while providing
excellent habitat. Enhancement of water diversion operations, flood
protection characteristics, and connectivity with proposed downstream
flood protection measures could also be key design features of this
multi-objective project, as has been accomplished elsewhere.
The impassable and obsolete
Searsville Dam blocks native fish, such as steelhead trout, and other
aquatic species from accessing San Francisquito Creek’s largest,
historic spawning and rearing tributary flowing through Portola Valley
and Woodside. The artificial, warm-water habitat of the disappearing
reservoir also supports numerous non-native and invasive species,
including a variety of fish and bullfrogs, which compete with and prey
upon native species both within the reservoir and downstream where they
spill over. The stagnant reservoir also degrades water quality and
operations of the dam include no dedicated bypass flows for downstream
fish and wildlife.
Sediment management
alternatives can include stabilizing much of the sediment, vegetation,
and riparian habitat currently in place while some can be used for
agricultural uses nearby and other uses. Managers of ongoing wetland
restoration projects in San Francisco Bay have expressed a need for
millions of cubic yards of clean sediment. Recent USGS studies have also
found that natural sediment transport down SF Bay creeks is needed to
ensure that there is sufficient silt to help build up coastal wetlands
in the face of projected sea-level-rise. Removal of Searsville Dam would
provide some of this needed sediment back to bay wetlands while helping
to minimize project costs.
Stanford- Please show some leadership and stewardship! Take down the dam.
ReplyDeleteSome of the brains at the prestigious Stanford University have had their brains silted in. So deep in the muck, they can no longer think clearly, and have been known to have visions of Arkansas, right here in salmon and steelhead country.
ReplyDelete